Very nice program to tag audio files, I love it

It cant handle songs with norwegian letters... ÆØÅ

Appears to be insecure according to Widows operating system and Bitdefender antivirus, but it seems to work fine, so I guess it'd okay.

Does what it should do …. but ...
- installed via Docker, the Container tends to restart without a reason sometimes
- forgets his Licence occasionally
- I miss: Tag files from filename like in Jaikoz
- Discogs Albums often not found or recognized, even when explicit stated
- Sometimes … slow (100 songs and more at a time)
I like the clean look :-)

Not so obvious to find complete Classical music metadata.

Works well, the media library software I use is iTunes it’s a little slow to register the changes but the software works very well and does a very good job

Song Kong has been invaluable to clean and standardise the metadata of my 15k+ files which had grown a tail of detritus over the years a a result of ripping, numerous streaming services and Roon Simple interface, pretty self explanatory but good online reference when required. Highly recommended

The breadth of set-up choices for each task is quite confusing for the beginner. Even though there is quick support from Paul Taylor, I still find it difficult to get duplicate albums removed, if they are sitting in different folders or in different sections of the Melco (main library vs library for CD rips). Even duplicate songs sitting in the same folder are not being recognized as duplicates with the settings that I have chosen. It may be all me, but I just don‘t seem to get SongKong to di what I want.

Great tool worth spending time on it to make the most of it.

Do what it has to do
And the support on the forums is great and reactive

I used it on 1,200 wav files. Took time to work through where the data is kept so I could do an export to Excel - but it worked fine

first time I used songKong i got the Meterdata but now it doesing work like it use to with getting the Meterdata!

Does what it is supposed to do, some functions are complicated to perform, user interface is rather primitive, it is rather slow, it took about 72 hours to fix my collection of 3000 albums.

Great product very useful

It gets 4 stars from me because feature wise it has no competitors AFAIK (at least not ones that work on Linux). The UI is much improved from the much older version that I upgraded from, though I am not a fan of "subscription-like" model that is now being used (I understand why the dev is doing that but still not a fan). What would make it even better, for me would be opus and itunes like Explicit Song tagging. Anyway, would I continue to pay for it, yes, its the best/only of its kind that works in linux.

It does pretty much what it should. Only improvement I could think of is an interactive mode to see what it does exactly with some selection of albums.

Nice program to manage your music directory. Satisfied user.

The app is great, but not as simple as it could be, there could be a standard baseline of function, then the elite can manipulate the settings to suit their needs. From a test perspective, I processed say 100gb of various files, it ruined almost all of the existing structure and placed the various artist in with the artists albums, detached existing complete albums into va folders to a point where nearly all the files were stripped and put into random albums. I patiently used jaikoz to manually process my collection, I can't say after buying songkong w/pro that'll I ever use it, jaikoz is more reliable. The music scene seems a mess, a universal standard of genres for example doesn't even seem to be established between jaikoz and songkong? Processing music files is such a convoluted process compared to tv/movies, it seems between disco and brainz or any other website/forum etc. a case of the more eccentric the better causing dysfunction in the meta world of music. These apps are brilliant in their right but destructive at best not carefully watched. I use them purely for a mass naming tool more than anything else. Im not a scientific meta wiz and Until it becomes cleaner from the initial install by identifying your use of the app with a check list of how you want to process your collection, the stock settings cannot be trusted and diving into the sets after install is daunting. I use media centre master, have done for years, great thing to note is you can backup your profile/s as you use the app. This makes it a shit load easier to manage when you have a reinstall, new pc etc. I've been using the same profile saves for 10+ yrs.. I'd feel safer about using it if shared profile sets from users with similar collections were used, I guess I don't know enough about meta and where it comes from and how is attached to different files to change many settings safely without wasting time having to undo or test everything I do with the app, isn't that what developers do? We all have the same music to a degree but who keeps changing the meta Hahaha anyway my two bobs worth Paul, cheers inexperienced user with money to burn on apps that don't give me confidence to use them to their true potential.

I liked that it found the back cover also. Helped me make sure I had the right cd of the music.

Was not able to get info from wav music files or mp3 files. seems like it needs the album name to get info. I do not have the album names. Jiakoz would not even start up - some kind of license issue even though I have a license.jai file To get the info I need I will do web lookups - time consuming - but I will get the data